Reform Marijuana Laws NORML Site Map Contact Us About Marijuana Law Reform Media Contact About Marijuana Law Reform Home
Working to reform marijuana laws
search by
Click here to navigate by map
State Laws | Leyes Estatales
 
 
 
 
 
Get NORML's eZine
Legislative Alerts, News & Analysis from NORML

Details & Privacy


Get NORML's eZine
Meet Others, Share Stories
 

Home > News Archive > 2008 > Vermont Supreme Court Rules Search Warrant Required for Overflight Surveillance

Vermont Supreme Court Rules Search Warrant Required for Overflight Surveillance

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter Check our RSS Feeds

April 3, 2008 - Montpelier, VT, USA

Montpelier, VT: The Vermont Supreme Court ruled last week that police must first obtain a search warrant before making low level surveillance flights over private property.

The case began after a Forest Service official, believing defendant Stephan Bryant to be "paranoid" about his privacy, suggested to Vermont State Police that they conduct a fly-over to look for marijuana. On Aug. 7, 2003, a state trooper and an Army National Guard pilot flew over the property hovering about 100 feet above it for 15 to 30 minutes, according to Friday’s court opinion. Two plots of marijuana were spotted from the air. Law enforcement then applied for and received a search warrant, and seized about 45 plants.

Ruling that Vermonters’ right to privacy extends to the airspace above their homes, the state’s highest court threw out a felony marijuana cultivation conviction against Bryant. A 57-year-old contractor, Bryant testified at his 2005 trial that he uses marijuana as an analgesic, to cope with pain he suffers as the result of a construction accident in the 1970s. His property, on a wooded hillside in a remote area of Goshen, is accessible only by a locked gate on a US Forest Service road.

In a 4-1 decision, the justices said the helicopter wasn’t high enough when it made its flyover.

"The occupants were law-enforcement officers, trained in the identification of marijuana, who conducted an overflight at illegal altitudes solely for the purpose of discovering evidence of crime within a private enclave into which they were constitutionally forbidden to intrude at ground level without a warrant," the Court wrote in it’s ruling. "The actions of law enforcement — flying only 100 feet above the ground for up to 30 minutes over a hillside home — were an unreasonable intrusion of privacy that triggers constitutional protection."

"It doesn’t matter if the invasion comes on wheels or on helicopter rotors," said Bryant’s lawyer, William Nelson. "Vermonters have a right to expect the government will not be intruding on their privacy, whether it’s in their house, in their backyard or on their property."

For more information, contact NORML Legal Director Keith Stroup at 202-483-5500.

    updated: Apr 03, 2008

Share This Page Share This Page on digg Share This Page on Reddit Share This Page on del.icio.us Share This Page on Stumble Upon Share This Page on Facebook Share This Page on Twitter Check our RSS Feeds

2010   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   1999   1998   1997   1996  
Country State/Prov Year Month
Join the NORML Legal Committee
Features
Features
   
NORML
Site MapContact UsSupport NORMLTake ActionLibrary
© 2010 NORML • Privacy StatementSite Terms • Site by Communicopia and Red Aphid
NORML and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832
Tel: (202) 483-5500 • Fax: (202) 483-0057 • Email: norml@norml.org